The
Budget indicates that the Federal Government will cease distributing new
pennies, given that each penny costs 1.6 cents to produce. While existing pennies will continue to have
value indefinitely, the Budget suggests that the Federal Government will work
with charities and other institutions like Imagine Canada, to arrange fundraising campaigns around
the elimination of the penny.
We assume
that "penny fundraising" will take place almost entirely without
official donation receipts being issued – relying on a mix of pure
philanthropic motives and a desire to put penny jars to better use. Given the absence of any tax credit in penny
fundraising, donors may well be more willing than usual to make gifts to
non-charitable non-profit organizations.
Thus, non-profit organizations should be particularly aware of this
(small) fundraising opportunity.
Haut de la page
The
Budget proposes new rules impacting the ability of charities to engage
in political activities and requiring new disclosure rules on political
activities.
Current
rules re political activities
Charities
in Canada advocate regularly on many issues of public policy. Much of that activity falls within the realm
of charitable activity and is widely recognized as a positive for our
communities. The Income Tax Act also permits
registered charities to engage in limited non-partisan political activities
that are ancillary and incidental to their charitable purposes. “Political activities” are generally
understood to include any activities intended to promote the change or
retention of any law or policy of any level of government (whether Canadian or
foreign), or to encourage the public to contact any public official with a view
to promoting changes in the law or policy.
However, a charity’s political activities cannot be partisan (directly or
indirectly support, or be in opposition to, any political party
or candidate for public office).
Proposed
changes
While the
Federal Government acknowledges that charities play a valuable role in the
development of public policy in Canada, it indicates that there is a need to
ensure that charities respect the limits on political activities which are
currently in the Income Tax Act. The Federal Government also sees a need for
greater transparency in respect of these activities. These concerns appear to be driven by a
perceived increase in foreign funding of charities engaged in advocacy
activities, particularly in relation to environmental issues like pipeline approvals.
The
Budget proposes a new definition of “political activity” that includes the
making of a gift to a qualified donee if it can reasonably be considered that a
purpose of the gift is to support the political activities of the qualified
donee. The definition of “charitable
purpose” will also be revised to exclude gifts to qualified donees that
constitute political activities under the new definition.
The result
of these changes is that grants to qualified donees that can be considered to
be made in support of the donee’s political activities will be considered
expenditures by the donor charity on political activities and these expenditures
will be included in the calculation of the resources of the donor charity devoted
to political activities.
The Federal
Government is also proposing that the CRA increase the required reporting that
charities must make on political activities, including the extent to which such
political activities are funded by foreign sources. The Budget does not provide detail on the
increased reporting that will be required, but we expect that charities will be
required to disclose the amounts received from foreign sources for political
activities, and possibly the identities of the foreign donors.
Intermediate
sanctions for political activities are introduced by the Budget. These will
allow the CRA to penalize Canadian charities or RCAAAs and for excess expenditures on
political activities where under the current provisions of the Income Tax Act revocation was the only
sanction available.
Further, the CRA will be
granted the ability to suspend the tax-receipting privileges of a charity or
RCAAA that provides incomplete information in its annual
information return until the charity provides the required information. The impetus for this latter provision appears
to be to ensure that charities file all required information regarding
political activities, but depending on how the legislation is drafted, it could
potentially be applied to any incomplete information on a T3010 Return.
Comments
These
rules raise several issues of concern.
In particular, it is unclear when a grant to a qualified donee will be
considered to be made with “a purpose” of supporting the political activities
of the qualified donee. Many qualified
donees engage in small amounts of political activities in support of their
charitable mission. Will all gifts to these organizations be considered to have
been made with a purpose of supporting these political activities, or only
gifts specifically earmarked for political activities? If all gifts are caught, will the entirety of
the gift be considered an expenditure on political activities, or only the portion of the gift that corresponds with the proportion of political
activities of the donee? Furthermore,
how is a charity to know whether and to what extent a qualified donee engages
in political activities, and as of when must this be determined (a problem that
is only compounded when considering that if the donee is a registered charity,
it may itself have made grants to other qualified donees which are deemed to be
expenditures on political activities under the new rules)?
Without
clarity on these issues, a charity may find itself offside the new restrictions
on political activities without knowing it and without an option to avoid it,
short of ceasing all funding of qualified donees. At a minimum, the calculation
of resources spent on political activities has become dramatically more
complicated and difficult. We expect
that Canadian grant making charities should begin using granting agreements
designed to provide explicit limitations on the recipients’ political activity.
It is
difficult to comment on the proposed increased reporting requirements in the
absence of specific details on what will now be required to be disclosed. However, such increased disclosure naturally
raises potential privacy concerns on the part of foreign donors that have a
legitimate interest in not having their donations made public.
We will
continue to monitor these rules and any CRA commentary on them. It is hoped that the rules will be revised
before being enacted to provide greater clarity on their interpretation and
application, and to ensure that charities are not subjected to an unreasonably
onerous reporting regime in respect of political activities. Nonetheless, given the political climate and
these new rules, foreign charities funding advocacy in Canada and Canadian
charities funding or doing advocacy (particularly environmental advocacy)
should be very careful.
Haut de la page
The
Budget also proposes changes to the process by which foreign organizations that
have received a grant from the Federal Government will be considered qualified donees
under the Income Tax Act.
Current
rules
Generally,
non-Canadian organizations are not qualified donees under the Income Tax Act.
Thus, Canadian donors cannot obtain charitable donation tax credits or
deductions for gifts to them, and registered charities are not permitted to
make outright grants to them.
An
exception exists, however, for foreign charitable organizations that have
received a gift from the Government of Canada in the 36 month period beginning
24 months before that time. These organizations
are deemed to be qualified donees under the Income
Tax Act. As qualified donees, these foreign charitable organizations may
issue official donation receipts for gifts from Canadian donors. Canadian
registered charities may also make gifts to foreign charitable
organizations that are qualified donees.
Proposed
changes
The Budget
proposes that foreign charitable organizations that receive a gift from the
Federal Government may apply for qualified donee status if they pursue
activities:
- related to disaster relief or urgent humanitarian aid; or
- in the national interest of Canada.
The
Minister of National Revenue, in consultation with the Minister of Finance, will
have the discretionary power to grant qualified donee status to a foreign
charitable organization that meets these criteria. Qualified donee status will
be public, and will last for a 24-month period beginning generally no later than
the date of the gift from the Federal Government.
Foreign
charities that have qualified donee status under the existing rules by virtue
of having received a Federal government gift will continue to be qualified
donees until the expiration of the period of their current status.
The Budget
documents state that the CRA will develop guidance regarding the administration
of this measure.
This
measure will apply to applications made by foreign charitable organizations on
or after the later of January 1, 2013 and Royal Assent to the enacting
legislation.
Comments
The
Federal Government states that the new rules will ensure that qualified donee
status is granted only to approve foreign charitable organizations that carry
out activities of significance to, and in the interest of, the Canadian public.
While this goal is laudable in principle, presumably any foreign organizations
that have received grants from the Federal Government are carrying out
activities determined by the Federal Government to be in the interest of the
Canadian public. We believe that this change is actually seeking to ensure that
the foreign qualified donee status is limited to specific large foreign
charities that will now be more clearly under the authority of the Canada
Revenue Agency. Note as well, that this
change accepts a recommendation of the 1990 Report
of the Auditor General of Canada to the House of Commons.
Donors
and charities considering grants to foreign organizations should continue to
consult the list of qualifying foreign organizations in Information-Circular
84-3R6. Note that this list, which we
believe to be incomplete, will now become official. We will monitor any CRA commentary on the new
registration regime, and will report any developments in this Newsletter.
Haut de la page
The
Budget proposes a new incentive to encourage the promotion of literacy by registered
charities and certain non-profit organizations.
Current
rules
The Excise
Tax Act currently provides for a rebate of the GST (and the federal portion
of the HST) for certain books and related items (including audio recordings and
printed scripture) acquired by public libraries, educational institutions, as
well as charities and qualifying non-profit organizations prescribed by regulation
whose primary purpose is the promotion of literacy.
Currently,
however, the rebate does not apply to tax paid on printed books purchased to be
sold or donated.
Proposed
changes
Under the
Budget proposals, charities and qualifying non-profit literacy organizations
prescribed by regulation will be allowed to claim a rebate of the GST (and the federal
portion of the HST) paid to acquire printed books to be given away. The rebate applies to the acquisition of the
following:
- printed books or updates of such books;
- audio recordings all or substantially all of which consist of a
spoken reading of a printed book; and
- bound or unbound printed versions of the scripture of any
religion.
The
Budget states that this change will allow those literacy organizations
prescribed by regulation to claim a rebate of tax paid on printed books, where,
for example, such books are purchased to be given to children from low income
households who might not otherwise be able to afford them.
This
measure will apply to acquisitions and importations of printed books in respect
of which tax becomes payable after Budget Day.
Haut de la page
The
Budget proposes various new rules and penalties related to tax shelters
generally, as well as some changes specific to charitable donation tax
shelters.
Current
rules
The Income Tax Act requires that all tax
shelters be registered and obtain a tax shelter identification number. The Income
Tax Act imposes a penalty on any person (normally the tax shelter promoter)
who sells an interest in, or accepts consideration in respect of, a tax shelter
that is not registered with CRA, or who files false information in an
application to register a tax shelter. Correspondingly, a participant in the
tax shelter is denied any related claim or deduction until the tax shelter is
registered and the penalty is paid.
The
penalty is currently the greater of $500 and 25% of the consideration received
or receivable in respect of the tax shelter. The Budget materials use the
following example; if a participant were to pay $12,000 to acquire from a
promoter a property that is an unregistered tax shelter, the penalty to the
promoter would equal $3,000.
Proposed
changes
The
Budget states that, in the context of some charitable donation tax shelters,
the cost to participants of the property acquired is relatively small in
relation to the tax savings that the promoter asserts are available to
participants. The result therefore is that the penalty may be less effective in
encouraging compliance by the promoter.
The
Budget proposes that in the case of a charitable donation tax
shelter, this penalty will be the greater of 25% of the amount asserted by the
promoter to be the value of property that participants in the tax shelter can
transfer to a donee, or the amount determined under the existing rules. Thus, to take the example above, if a
participant in a donation tax shelter pays $12,000 and is advised by the
promoter that he or she will be able to claim that donated property has a value
of $100,000, the penalty for the promoter if the tax shelter is not registered
will be $25,000.
This
measure will generally apply on Royal Assent to the enacting legislation.
Additional
Measures
A
promoter is required to file an annual information return if he or she accepts
consideration, or acts as a principal or agent, in respect of a tax
shelter. This return must include the
amount paid by each participant who has acquired an interest in the tax
shelter. Failure to file results in a penalty equal to the greater of $100 and
$25 multiplied by the number of days that the return is outstanding, to a
maximum of $2,500.
The
Budget proposes that an additional penalty be imposed if a promoter fails either:
- to file an annual information return in response to a demand by CRA;
or
- to report in the return an amount paid by a participant in respect of
the tax shelter.
The new
penalty will be equal to 25% of the consideration received or receivable by a
promoter in respect of all interests in the tax shelter that should have been,
but were not, reported in an annual information return. In the case of a charitable donation tax
shelter for which amounts paid by the participants are not reported, the
penalty will be the greater of 25% of the consideration received or receivable
by the promoter and the amount asserted by the promoter to be the value of the
property that those participants can transfer to a donee.
This
measure will apply to demands to file made by the CRA after Royal Assent to the
enacting legislation, and to returns filed after Royal Assent to the enacting
legislation.
The
Budget also proposes to make tax shelter identification numbers valid only for
the calendar year identified in the application for the number filed with the CRA. This is in contrast to the current approach
in which tax shelter identification numbers are valid indefinitely.
This
measure will apply to applications made on or after Budget Day. Tax shelter
identification numbers issued as a result of applications made before Budget
Day will be valid until the end of 2013.
Commentary
While it may be difficult to be critical of measures designed to hold accountable promoters of abusive tax shelters, the definitions of tax shelters and promoter are broad and it is certainly possible that they could catch relatively innocent but mistaken charities and their staff.
Haut de la page
Unfortunately
for the sector, the Budget does not include any new measures to increase incentives
for charitable giving notwithstanding that the 2011 Federal Budget confirmed
that the Standing Committee on Finance study how current incentives for
charitable giving might be enhanced or improved.
The
Budget confirms that the Standing Committee on Finance is continuing its review
of charitable donation incentives. Since
its request for submissions from the public in January 2012, it has received
numerous proposals for new measures to increase public giving. These have included a charitable donation
stretch credit – in which increases in giving from year to year receive
increased tax recognition – as well as the extension of the exemption from
capital gains tax to donations of private company shares and real property.
These
measures, it appears, will need to wait until at least 2013. We remain hopeful that the Standing
Committee will recommend at least some additional donation incentives and that
the Federal Government will include such measures in next year’s Budget. We will continue to monitor developments in
this area.
Haut de la page
The Budget contains a number of spending
initiatives relevant to the voluntary sector.
Some of the more interesting include the following.
Innovation
The Budget puts significant emphasis on
innovation as an economic engine. One
important area of innovation in the Budget is the encouragement of researchers,
primarily at charities like major research universities, to commercialize pure and applied research findings. This is proposed to be accomplished in part
by encouraging businesses and academics to work more closely together.
Education
and Research
The Budget proposes specific targeted
research grants to various medical and other research charities. It also proposes more generally an additional
$500 Million over 5 years to the Canada Foundation for Innovation.
Youth
Employment
The Budget proposes $50 million in
additional funding for youth employment.
Given that the examples of successful youth employment programs in the
budget materials all involve charities or non-profit organizations, this
measure may support significant youth hiring in the voluntary sector. Similarly, the Budget allocates $30 million
toward employment programs for people with disabilities.
Social Finance
The Budget confirms that the Federal
Government views social finance as being important and will continue to seek
ways to better support social capital flow, with details to be developed by the
Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development over the next few months.
Haut de la page
Absent from the Budget is any proposal to
alter the current regime that exempts non-profit organizations that are not charities, from tax on their income.
Organizations that do not otherwise qualify
as charitable but are otherwise organized for social welfare, civic
improvement, recreation or any purpose other than profit, are exempt from tax
under paragraph 149(1)(l) of the Income
Tax Act. This long standing
exemption from tax (it was originally enacted in 1917) has come under much
greater Canada Revenue Agency scrutiny in the past few years.
The Canada Revenue Agency is engaged
currently in a program of auditing non-profits across Canada. It is understood at this time that the audit
initiative would target 1400 organizations and is an information gathering
program to give the government a better understanding of the revenue generation
activities pursued by tax exempt non-profit organizations.
Some in the sector were concerned that the
Government would introduce changes to the non- profit tax exemption provisions
in this Budget. It did not. We continue to encourage the Department of
Finance and the Canada Revenue Agency to consider entering into a dialogue with
sector organizations if they have concerns in this area before making
ill-conceived changes to the current regime.
Those who are interested in reading about other sections of the Budget may wish to consult Miller Thomson's general Budget Release, available here.
Haut de la page
Dernières nouvelles
Amanda Stacey spoke on "Charitable Gifting with Life Insurance" at the Federated Press
Tax-Effective Planning for Insurance & Investment session held on February
28, 2012 in Toronto, Ontario.
Robert Hayhoe presented “Charity Law” to Altravest Board Match Leader on March 22, 2012 in Toronto,
Ontario.
Haut de la page
© Miller Thomson LLP, 2013. All Rights Reserved. All Intellectual Property Rights including copyright in this publication are owned by Miller Thomson LLP. This publication may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety provided no alterations are made to the form or content. Any other form of reproduction or distribution requires the prior written consent of Miller Thomson LLP which may be requested from the Editor(s).
This publication is provided as an information service and is a summary of current legal issues. This information is not meant as legal opinion and readers are cautioned not to act on information provided in this publication without seeking specific legal advice with respect to their unique circumstances.
Miller Thomson LLP uses your contact information to send you information on legal topics and firm events that may be of interest to you. It does not share your personal information outside the firm, except with subcontractors who have agreed to abide by its privacy policy and other rules. If you do not wish Miller Thomson to use your contact information in this manner, please notify us at newsletters@millerthomson.com and include "Privacy Request" in the subject line.